1962 Austin A 90 vs. 2010 Mazda MPV

To start off, 2010 Mazda MPV is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda MPV (134 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda MPV weights approximately 140 kg more than 1962 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda MPV (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 90. (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 90.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 90 2010 Mazda MPV
Make Austin Mazda
Model A 90 MPV
Year Released 1962 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 310 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.5 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 18.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1710 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2850 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 75 L