1962 Austin A 90 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 90 (120 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1962 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 90 (221 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 1962 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 90 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 90 | Aveo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 46 L |