1962 Austin A 90 vs. 2013 Ford Escape
To start off, 2013 Ford Escape is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Escape (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Escape weights approximately 28 kg more than 1962 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Escape, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Escape (230 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 90. (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 90. 2013 Ford Escape has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 90 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Escape will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 90 | 2013 Ford Escape | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 90 | Escape |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1598 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4524 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2078 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 57 L |