1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1962 Austin A 99 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 62 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1962 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 99 | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 99 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3210 mm |
