1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1962 Austin A 99 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 665 kg more than 1962 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 99 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 99 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3300 mm |
