1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1966 Triumph Vitesse is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | A 99 | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 89 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 38 L |