1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1970 MG MGB
To start off, 1970 MG MGB is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1970 MG MGB. (98 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1970 MG MGB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1970 MG MGB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 MG MGB. (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 1970 MG MGB | |
Make | Austin | MG |
Model | A 99 | MGB |
Year Released | 1962 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 880 kg |