1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1971 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 8,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 600 kg more than 1962 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 1971 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 99 | Eldorado |
Year Released | 1962 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 8192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3220 mm |