1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1972 Mazda RX-4

To start off, 1972 Mazda RX-4 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-4.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-4.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 99 1972 Mazda RX-4
Make Austin Mazda
Model A 99 RX-4
Year Released 1962 1972
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 2616 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 110 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 165 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1110 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4400 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2520 mm