1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1974 Seat 133

To start off, 1974 Seat 133 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1974 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1974 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 840 kg more than 1974 Seat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Seat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Seat 133.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 99 1974 Seat 133
Make Austin Seat
Model A 99 133
Year Released 1962 1974
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 841 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 110 HP 34 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 54 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 690 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 3460 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1430 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2030 mm