1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1983 Pininfarina Coupe
To start off, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe (125 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99.
Because 1962 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Pininfarina Coupe. (176 Nm). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Pininfarina Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 1983 Pininfarina Coupe | |
Make | Austin | Pininfarina |
Model | A 99 | Coupe |
Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 125 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2450 mm |