1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1983 Renault 9
To start off, 1983 Renault 9 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1983 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1983 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 1983 Renault 9 | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 99 | 9 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 38 L |