1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Austin | Zastava |
Model | A 99 | 102 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2160 mm |