1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1986 Holden Commodore

To start off, 1986 Holden Commodore is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Holden Commodore (116 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1986 Holden Commodore.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Holden Commodore (232 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 99. (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 99.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 99 1986 Holden Commodore
Make Austin Holden
Model A 99 Commodore
Year Released 1962 1986
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 3298 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 110 HP 116 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 232 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 2600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1220 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4720 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2680 mm