1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1986 Honda Integra
To start off, 1986 Honda Integra is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Honda Integra (113 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99.
Because 1962 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Honda Integra has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Honda Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 1986 Honda Integra | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | A 99 | Integra |
Year Released | 1962 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 113 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4285 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2450 mm |