1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1988 BMW 535

To start off, 1988 BMW 535 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,430 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 BMW 535 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 BMW 535 (211 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 BMW 535 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 BMW 535 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1962 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 BMW 535 (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 99. (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1988 BMW 535 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 99. 1988 BMW 535 has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1988 BMW 535 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 99 1988 BMW 535
Make Austin BMW
Model A 99 535
Year Released 1962 1988
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 3430 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 110 HP 211 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 305 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1630 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4730 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2770 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 70 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]