1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1989 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 1989 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 12 kg more than 1962 Austin A 99.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 99. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 1989 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 99 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1962 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 4228 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1542 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 57 L |