1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1989 Mazda 626

To start off, 1989 Mazda 626 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1989 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 626. (134 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 99 1989 Mazda 626
Make Austin Mazda
Model A 99 626
Year Released 1962 1989
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1789 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 110 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 134 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 77 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1120 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2580 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]