1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1992 Renault Racoon

To start off, 1992 Renault Racoon is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Racoon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 99. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon.

Compare all specifications: