1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1995 BMW Just 4
To start off, 1995 BMW Just 4 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW Just 4 (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW Just 4 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99.
Because 1995 BMW Just 4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 99. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 BMW Just 4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW Just 4 (260 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 99. (221 Nm). This means 1995 BMW Just 4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 99. 1995 BMW Just 4 has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 BMW Just 4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 99 | 1995 BMW Just 4 | |
| Make | Austin | BMW |
| Model | A 99 | Just 4 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1097 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2730 mm |
