1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 (408 HP) has 298 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A 99 | F200 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 408 HP |
Top Speed | 162 km/hour | 259 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1405 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |