1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1996 Renault Clio

To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 120 kg more than 1962 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 99. (221 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 99.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 99 1996 Renault Clio
Make Austin Renault
Model A 99 Clio
Year Released 1962 1996
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 2912 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 110 HP 250 HP
Torque 221 Nm 407 Nm
Top Speed 162 km/hour 250 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1650 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2490 mm