1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1999 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1999 Ford Windstar is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99.
Because 1962 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 99 | 1999 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 99 | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3066 mm |
