1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 322 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 99 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 99 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3260 mm |
