1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2001 Daewoo Lanos
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 495 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (150 Nm). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 2001 Daewoo Lanos | |
Make | Austin | Daewoo |
Model | A 99 | Lanos |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1035 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 48 L |