1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2001 Hyundai Matrix

To start off, 2001 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2001 Hyundai Matrix. (104 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 2001 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 300 kg more than 2001 Hyundai Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Hyundai Matrix. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Hyundai Matrix.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 99 2001 Hyundai Matrix
Make Austin Hyundai
Model A 99 Matrix
Year Released 1962 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1599 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 110 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 144 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 76.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 87 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1230 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4030 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1640 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 72 L