1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2001 Lada Roadster
To start off, 2001 Lada Roadster is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2001 Lada Roadster. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Because 1962 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lada Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lada Roadster. (116 Nm). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lada Roadster. 2001 Lada Roadster has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lada Roadster will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 2001 Lada Roadster | |
Make | Austin | Lada |
Model | A 99 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1497 cc |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 116 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2500 mm |