1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2001 Nissan HyperMini
To start off, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,988 cc, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. (130 Nm). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. 2001 Nissan HyperMini has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan HyperMini will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 2001 Nissan HyperMini | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 99 | HyperMini |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2988 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 2670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 1900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 76 L |