1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2003 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2003 Skoda Fabia is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2003 Skoda Fabia. (74 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 2003 Skoda Fabia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 400 kg more than 2003 Skoda Fabia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Skoda Fabia. (195 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Skoda Fabia.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 2003 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Austin | Skoda |
Model | A 99 | Fabia |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 19.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 45 L |