1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 221 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 99 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 99 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 75 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 61 L |
