1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, 2004 Ford F-150 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 307 kg more than 1962 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (343 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 99. (221 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 99.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 99 | F-150 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 203 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 343 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1837 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 95 L |