1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2005 Bugatti Chiron
To start off, 2005 Bugatti Chiron is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 6,255 cc (18 cylinders), 2005 Bugatti Chiron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (547 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 437 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99.
Because 2005 Bugatti Chiron is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 99. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (650 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 99. (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Bugatti Chiron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 99.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 2005 Bugatti Chiron | |
Make | Austin | Bugatti |
Model | A 99 | Chiron |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 6255 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 18 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 547 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 650 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 75.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1160 mm |