1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1221 kg more than 1962 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 99. (221 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 99.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 99 | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | A 99 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5621 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 330 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 509 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2751 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2440 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 132 L |
