1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2006 Nissan Interstar
To start off, 2006 Nissan Interstar is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Interstar (112 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Interstar should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Interstar (290 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 99. (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Interstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 99.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 99 | 2006 Nissan Interstar | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 99 | Interstar |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Top Speed | 162 km/hour | 139 km/hour |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 100 L |
