1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2008 Tata Indica

To start off, 2008 Tata Indica is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 525 kg more than 2008 Tata Indica.

Because 1962 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Tata Indica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Tata Indica. (135 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Tata Indica.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 99 2008 Tata Indica
Make Austin Tata
Model A 99 Indica
Year Released 1962 2008
Engine Size 2912 cc 1405 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 110 HP 0 HP
Torque 221 Nm 135 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1005 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 3680 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2410 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 37 L