1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt

To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 220 kg more than 1962 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt. (203 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 99 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt
Make Austin Chevrolet
Model A 99 Cobalt
Year Released 1962 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 2201 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 110 HP 155 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 203 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4900 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1750 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 49 L