1962 Austin A 99 vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 487 kg more than 2013 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 99 | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 99 | 2 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 43 L |