1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1946 Skoda Polular 995
To start off, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Skoda Polular 995. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Skoda Polular 995 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1946 Skoda Polular 995. (22 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II should accelerate faster than 1946 Skoda Polular 995. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II weights approximately 428 kg more than 1946 Skoda Polular 995. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 1946 Skoda Polular 995 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Skoda |
| Model | 3000 Mk II | Polular 995 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 22 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1490 mm |
