1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1954 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1954 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II should accelerate faster than 1954 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot Baby weights approximately 492 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 1954 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Talbot |
Model | 3000 Mk II | Baby |
Year Released | 1962 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2693 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3130 mm |