1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1958 Buick 40
To start off, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,971 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Buick 40 weights approximately 682 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 1958 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Buick |
| Model | 3000 Mk II | 40 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 1840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3110 mm |
