1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1966 Simca 1300

To start off, 1966 Simca 1300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1966 Simca 1300. (51 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II should accelerate faster than 1966 Simca 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II weights approximately 168 kg more than 1966 Simca 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Simca 1300. (102 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Simca 1300.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II 1966 Simca 1300
Make Austin-Healey Simca
Model 3000 Mk II 1300
Year Released 1962 1966
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2912 cc 1289 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 129 HP 51 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 74 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 75 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1158 kg 990 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4250 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1580 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2530 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 27 L 60 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]