1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1969 Fiat 130
To start off, 1969 Fiat 130 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 3,238 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Fiat 130 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Fiat 130 (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Fiat 130 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Fiat 130 weights approximately 442 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Fiat 130 (255 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Fiat 130 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 1969 Fiat 130 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Fiat |
Model | 3000 Mk II | 130 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3238 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 102.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 66 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 50 L |