1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1971 Humber Sceptre

To start off, 1971 Humber Sceptre is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1971 Humber Sceptre. (82 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II should accelerate faster than 1971 Humber Sceptre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II weights approximately 166 kg more than 1971 Humber Sceptre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Humber Sceptre. (123 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Humber Sceptre.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II 1971 Humber Sceptre
Make Austin-Healey Humber
Model 3000 Mk II Sceptre
Year Released 1962 1971
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1725 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 129 HP 82 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 123 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 81.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 82.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.2:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1158 kg 992 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 27 L 45 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]