1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1972 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1972 Cadillac Calais is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 972 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 1972 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
| Model | 3000 Mk II | Calais |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 2130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3310 mm |
