1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1979 Triumph TR8
To start off, 1979 Triumph TR8 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Triumph TR8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Triumph TR8 (155 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Triumph TR8 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II weights approximately 343 kg more than 1979 Triumph TR8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 1979 Triumph TR8 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Triumph |
Model | 3000 Mk II | TR8 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3532 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 155 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 71.1 mm |
Top Speed | 181 km/hour | 217 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2170 mm |