1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1980 Cadillac DeVille

To start off, 1980 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 752 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.

Because 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II has manual transmission. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II 1980 Cadillac DeVille
Make Austin-Healey Cadillac
Model 3000 Mk II DeVille
Year Released 1962 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 6030 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 129 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1158 kg 1910 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 5620 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 3090 mm