1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1985 Reliant Scimitar

To start off, 1985 Reliant Scimitar is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1985 Reliant Scimitar. (95 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II should accelerate faster than 1985 Reliant Scimitar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II weights approximately 271 kg more than 1985 Reliant Scimitar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Reliant Scimitar. (132 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Reliant Scimitar.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II 1985 Reliant Scimitar
Make Austin-Healey Reliant
Model 3000 Mk II Scimitar
Year Released 1962 1985
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1597 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 129 HP 95 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 132 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 80.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1158 kg 887 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 3890 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1250 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2140 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]