1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1989 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II should accelerate faster than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II weights approximately 8 kg more than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 1989 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
Model | 3000 Mk II | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1962 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2580 mm |