1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1990 Ford Tempo

To start off, 1990 Ford Tempo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1990 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II weights approximately 8 kg more than 1990 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1990 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II 1990 Ford Tempo
Make Austin-Healey Ford
Model 3000 Mk II Tempo
Year Released 1962 1990
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 2307 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 129 HP 96 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 175 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 93.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 84 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1158 kg 1150 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2540 mm