1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT
To start off, 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT (427 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (167 Nm). This means 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
Model | 3000 Mk II | 3000GT |
Year Released | 1962 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 427 Nm |
Top Speed | 181 km/hour | 257 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |